Archive for the 'GSC' Category

The Silence of the Synod

So the Synod has just ended: my twelfth, and there was less speaking from the floor during the whole Synod than during just the Monday evening session last year. Of course, the people who did speak were lovingly ridiculed and required to joyfully accept that.

Synod has been reduced to four microphones on the floor in the plenary, and that is probably too many. I am sure that one of the great contributions by the current staff before it retires will be a Synod where no one speaks from the floor.



Discernment Plus

It has been a while since I have been at GS as a regular delegate, and I know that the discernment process in the all-synod advisory groups is not new. But I noticed, last night, in particular, how manipulative this particular version is.
Read more…



RCA Management following outmoded models

I read the following in the Monday Business Section of The Globe and Mail, June 30, page B6. It’s from Harvey Schachter’s weekly page on best practices for management. As I read it, I thought that his advice is tailor made for the RCA. Our current management models (including our use of Carver) are all about centralized direction, closed discussions, and small selected groups making all the decisions, discouraging debate, restricting information, and speaking with one voice. Well, those are hardly best practices.
Read more…



GS 2008 Workbook Notations

Jim Reid has developed the following helpful commentary on the Workbook for next week’s General Synod. He focuses on two important yet typically overlooked sections: the report of the Commission on Church Order, and the proposed by-laws of the General Synod Council.

I encourage you to ponder what he has to say. Delegates to Synod especially will be edified.

Read more…



Bait and Switch

I noticed today that my church secretary had dutifully placed copies of “RCA Today” in every one of our consistory members’ mailboxes.

You would think there would have been a little more subtlety. It’s visually identical to the Church Herald. Format, fonts, artwork, layout.

We expressed to Wes two months ago that our concerns included “transparency” and “patterns of decision making.” The Bait-and-Switch strategy on the Church Herald is a perfect example.

Well done, General Synod Council and GSC staff. You really put one over on us all. And this was supposed to be in the cause of improving “communication”? Orwellian communication. I think of Jacques Ellul on Propaganda.



Whence the dialogue?

Whence the missional structures dialogue? Read more…



Signatories Chat with the General Secretary

Joint Declaration

The Chicago Invitation and Wesley Granberg-Michaelson

 

Read more…



Synod Report II

Three items might be of particular interest to readers of this blog. Read more…



The GSC Bylaws

One of the items coming up at General Synod is the proposed revised bylaws of the General Synod Council. It is this item that is the focus of the first Albany Synod overture.

The proposed bylaws are on pp. 53 ff. of the General Synod Workbook. In my opinion, to get the proper sense of the meaning and scope of the changes, you must read the proposed bylaws in conjunction with the “GSC Adopted Policy Document”.

Now Rett Zabriskie (Stated Clerk for Classis Passaic Valley) has written an excellent commentary on the proposed bylaws. Its telling refrain is “This is not of God.”

Here is an excerpt:

“We got the current GSC because we were told that, being elected from the Synod, it would actually be an executive committee and carry out the instructions of Synod in the months between synod meetings. But this article [Art. IV] eliminates that derivative connection and makes GSC simply another independent “agency” of Synod, like the seminaries or (for the moment) the Church Herald. The practical effect is that the Synod has no continuing presence. It only has existence when it is actually meeting as there is no longer any continuing executive committee. Thus government by office-bearers in assembly disappears. We are left with a meeting which can only be called a “Convention” , which has no staff or budget of its own and can only give instructions to one or more agencies and then wait a year or more to see what happens. All denominational decisions will now be made by the GSC – , which is not composed of office bearers, is not representative, and is not an assembly. This is not of God.”

Excellent material. Again, please check it out.

Dan Griswold



RCA’s GSC: Quo Vadis?

The General Synod by-laws.
GS 2007 is asked to approve the incorporation of the General Synod Council.
That is like changing Limited Power of Attorney status to Joint Tenancy,
and change from Agent to Owner.
Once accomplished, and GS meeting only bi-annually, it is easy to see what that will mean!
Let me illustrate it theologically.
Theologically it is the same as the development of a Mariology as a ‘helpful’ addition to Christology. All the talk about co-redemption is heresy.
The Reformed view is clear on this. Mary’s primary role is to highlight the Scriptural attestation that Jesus is ‘born of a woman’ (Gal 4:4).
‘Protestants’ see Mary as anchoring Jesus’ humanity.
Roman-Catholics reason from Jesus’ divinity to Mary’s unique status.
The GSC is, and remains, a ‘doulos.’ This Marian status is enough of an honor and responsibilty.
We need to affirm: the GSC is not the GS, nor vice versa.
2. Once ‘incorporated’ a move to another legal district is much easier accomplished…
Okke Postma




You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.